What are Traditional Accelerators

Venture accelerators stand as pivotal launching pads for startups, aiming to transform innovative ideas into thriving businesses. They provide a structured environment where early-stage companies receive mentorship, funding, and access to networks essential for growth. This article explores the accelerator ecosystem, detailing how these programs equip founders with the tools for success, navigate the challenges of rapid scaling, and make informed decisions about participation. It's a journey through understanding the unique support systems accelerators offer, their benefits and potential drawbacks, and ultimately, how they serve as a cornerstone in the startup community's foundation for innovation and impact.


Venture accelerators typically follow a structured program, ranging from a few months to a year, designed to fast-track startup growth. This period is intensive, focusing on mentorship, developing business models, refining products, and perfecting pitch presentations. Startups are expected to achieve rapid development milestones, culminating in a Demo Day where they present to investors. The desired outcomes are multifaceted: securing funding, establishing key industry connections, and significantly advancing the startup's market readiness. Accelerators aim to equip founders with the skills, knowledge, and network necessary to navigate the competitive landscape of their respective industries.

Pros of Accelerator Model:

  1. Rapid Growth: Accelerators ‘can’ compress years of growth into months.

  2. Mentorship: Direct access to seasoned entrepreneurs and industry experts.

  3. Networking: Opportunities to connect with investors, partners, and potential customers.

  4. Funding: Startups often receive seed funding to fuel early operations.

  5. Resource Access: Many programs offer workspaces, tech tools, and other operational resources.

Challenges of the Accelerator Model:

  1. Equity Exchange: Startups typically give up equity to participate, affecting long-term ownership.

  2. Intensive Pace: The fast-paced environment can be overwhelming and stressful.

  3. Generic Curriculum: Some programs may not tailor their guidance to each startup's unique needs.

  4. Competitive Atmosphere: The focus on pitching and investor attraction can foster a competitive rather than collaborative environment.

  5. One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Not all startups benefit equally from the standard accelerator model, particularly those in niche markets or at different stages of development.

Considerations When Selecting an Accelerator

Selecting the right accelerator is crucial for a startup's growth trajectory. The following list is designed to empower founders in making an informed decision when navigating the complex landscape of venture accelerators. Each point highlights critical aspects that directly impact the potential success and alignment with an accelerator program, offering a deeper understanding of what to consider beyond the surface-level benefits.

  1. Success Rate: Reveals the program's effectiveness in fostering startup growth and securing post-program opportunities. High success rates suggest a nurturing and impactful environment. When evaluating the success rate of a Venture Accelerator, it's essential to look beyond showcased success stories. While high-profile successes are impressive, they represent only a fraction of the total participants. For instance, if an accelerator highlights four major successes out of 4,000 participants, it's critical to question the outcomes of the remaining 3,996 ventures. This deeper dive helps assess the overall effectiveness and fit of the accelerator for your startup, ensuring a more balanced understanding of potential outcomes.

  2. Alumni Testimonials: Offer real-world insights into the program's benefits and challenges, helping gauge the personal and professional growth potential. It is useful to gather feedback on both positive and negative experiences of the program - There will always be both.

  3. Program Duration and Structure: Understanding this helps evaluate if the accelerator's pace and focus align with your startup's immediate needs and long-term goals. When considering the program's duration and structure, including whether it's physical or virtual, founders should weigh the pros and cons. Physical programs often provide a sense of community and direct interaction but may involve relocation costs and time investment. Virtual accelerators offer flexibility and access from anywhere, reducing logistical burdens and costs, but might lack the intensity of in-person connections. Evaluating these aspects helps determine the best fit for your startup's current situation and growth objectives, ensuring that the chosen accelerator maximizes your venture's potential benefits while minimizing logistical challenges and costs.

  4. Equity Requirements (No Funding): Essential for understanding the accelerator's value proposition when no initial funding is offered. Knowing this helps assess the cost-benefit ratio of accelerator participation, especially for founders cautious about diluting ownership.

  5. Mentor to Startup Ratio: A lower ratio indicates more personalized attention, crucial for tailored advice and support.

  6. Mentor Compensation (Paid vs. Volunteer): Mentors receiving compensation might offer more consistent, dedicated support due to their commitment, potentially aligning better with a startup's long-term goals. Conversely, volunteer mentors can bring a high level of enthusiasm and passion. However, their engagement may vary, potentially impacting their long-term dedication and alignment with the founders' objectives.

  7. Investor Network: The size and relevance of the network can significantly impact funding opportunities and strategic partnerships post-program.

  8. Initial Investment and Terms: Clarifies the financial kickstart provided by the accelerator, enabling better planning for your venture's early stages.

  9. Follow-on Funding: Indicates the program's success in preparing startups for future investment rounds, a key factor for long-term sustainability.

  10. Exit History: Information on exits provides insight into the program's track record in steering startups towards successful outcomes.


In choosing an accelerator, remember that beyond the brand's prestige or features touted in the press, the core objective for your early-stage venture should be tangible, positive outcomes. Every activity within the accelerator should be strategically aligned towards generating revenue or securing investment, crucial for building your venture's value and viability. Ground your decision in this reality to select a program that genuinely propels your startup forward, ensuring every effort contributes directly to your ultimate success.


For further information on Hangar 75:

Media: media@hangar75.com

Capital + Impact: capital@hangar75.com

Ventures: ventures@hangar75.com

General: hello@hangar75.com

Previous
Previous

Hangar 75 Vs. Traditional Accelerators

Next
Next

Traditional Accelerator Vs. Corporate Accelerator